Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of sales tax deferment was liable to be disallowed under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee's unit had been granted entitlement to sales tax deferment under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, and the corresponding certificate showed that the tax liability was treated as deferred payment for a specified period. The record also showed that the benefit remained operative for the relevant assessment year and had not been withdrawn or cancelled. In these circumstances, the liability was covered by the State deferment scheme and the earlier co-ordinate bench decisions in the assessee's own case squarely applied.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 43B was not warranted and the deletion of the addition was in law; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The revenue's challenge to the deletion of the sales tax deferment addition failed, and the assessment addition was not sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where sales tax liability is validly converted into deferred payment under a statutory incentive scheme and supported by the requisite entitlement certificate, the amount is not to be disallowed under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.