2012 (7) TMI 251 - AT - Income Tax

Court upholds rejection of accounts, estimates profits based on receipts & historical data. Appeal partly allowed, penalty direction non-appealable.

Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, Versus Income Tax Officer,  

The court upheld the rejection of books of accounts under section 145(3) due to lack of supporting vouchers, resulting in the estimation of net profits. ... Rejection of books of account on account of non-production of relevant registers, bills and vouchers or inventories before CIT(A) - estimation of net profits - assessee filed an affidavit that all the books of account as prescribed in Rule 6F were produced before the CIT(A) and denied the aforesaid observations of CIT(A) - Held that:- Since Revenue did not place any material controverting the averments in these affidavits and merely supported the findings of the CIT(A), hence it is find appropriate to restore these issues to file of CIT(A) for deciding the matter afresh, after verifying the genuineness of averments made in the aforesaid two affidavits - Appeal of assessee allowed for statistical purposes. Issues Involved:1. Rejection of books of accounts under section 145(3)2. Estimation of net profits disregarding claimed expenditures3. Disallowance of specific expenditures despite supporting documents4. Addition of disallowed expenditure for personal use5. Direction to consider penalty proceedings under section 271D6. Additional grounds for appealAnalysis:Issue 1: Rejection of books of accounts under section 145(3)The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed various expenses due to lack of supporting vouchers. The CIT(A) invoked section 145(3) as the appellant failed to produce necessary bills and vouchers. The appellant argued that cash payments were made due to special circumstances. The CIT(A) concluded that section 145(3) applied as required records were not maintained, leading to the estimation of net profits.Issue 2: Estimation of net profits disregarding claimed expendituresThe CIT(A) estimated net profits based on the appellant's professional receipts and historical data. Different net profit rates were applied for consultancy and hospital businesses. The CIT(A) calculated the total net profit and adjusted disallowed amounts, resulting in an enhanced income figure.Issue 3: Disallowance of specific expenditures despite supporting documentsThe AO disallowed expenses on canteen, miscellaneous items, consumable goods, and general expenses. The CIT(A) upheld these disallowances due to missing bills and vouchers. The appellant contested these disallowances, claiming that all documents were submitted, leading to a dispute over the accuracy of observations.Issue 4: Addition of disallowed expenditure for personal useCertain disallowed expenses for personal use were added to the estimated net profits. The CIT(A) calculated the gross total income after adjustments and deductions, resulting in an enhanced income figure compared to the AO's computation.Issue 5: Direction to consider penalty proceedings under section 271DThe CIT(A) directed the Additional CIT to consider penalty proceedings under section 271D. However, the Tribunal noted that the mere initiation of penalty proceedings is not appealable, leading to the dismissal of this ground.Issue 6: Additional grounds for appealNo new grounds were raised during the appeal, resulting in the dismissal of the residual ground. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fresh assessment by the CIT(A) based on verified information and proper examination of documents.This detailed analysis highlights the key issues addressed in the judgment, focusing on the rejection of books of accounts, estimation of net profits, disallowance of expenditures, addition of personal use expenses, penalty proceedings, and the disposal of the appeal.