TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal dismisses appeal over disallowed expenses for lack of proper vouching</h1> <h3>VK. Dewan & Co., Versus Income Tax Officer,</h3> VK. Dewan & Co., Versus Income Tax Officer, - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of expenses under the head 'salaries to staff' by the AO.2. Appeal against the order of CIT(A) reducing the addition made by the AO.Issue 1: Disallowance of expenses under the head 'salaries to staff' by the AOThe AO made an addition of Rs.70,000 to the income of the assessee due to unvouched nature of expenses claimed as salaries to staff. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal and reduced the addition to Rs.35,000. The appellant argued that proper details and evidence of payment of salaries were maintained, and the AO did not ask for further details or specify defects in the vouchers. Citing relevant case laws, the appellant contended that the disallowance was on an ad hoc basis without rationality. The Tribunal observed that the appellant failed to provide an explanation for the noted infirmity, and the addition of Rs.35,000 was less than 10% of the claimed expenses, justifying its sustenance. The Tribunal found no perversity or infirmity in the AO's action, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.Issue 2: Appeal against the order of CIT(A) reducing the addition made by the AOThe appellant contested the CIT(A)'s decision to confirm the addition of Rs.35,000 without a reasonable basis, arguing that the expenses were properly vouched. The AO and the CIT(A) maintained that the disallowance was to prevent revenue leakage due to unvouched expenses. The Tribunal noted that the appellant failed to establish any fault in the AO's action upheld by the CIT(A). As the appellant did not provide an explanation for the deficiency in vouching the expenses, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision. Consequently, the Tribunal found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs.35,000 out of the claimed expenses under the head 'salaries to staff,' as the appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the lack of proper vouching. The appeal against the CIT(A)'s decision to reduce the addition made by the AO was dismissed due to the absence of evidence supporting the appellant's claims.
TaxTMI 