Late-filed Revenue appeals allowed by ITAT for assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96 after remand.

The Revenue's late-filed appeals against the CIT(A)'s orders for assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96 were admitted after condonation. Disputes arose over the deletion of additions under section 69A and treatment of peak credits as unexplained cash credits. The Hon'ble ITAT, Ahmedabad directed a fresh assessment focusing on peak deposits. The CIT(A)'s non-speaking order lacking essential details led to remand for a comprehensive decision. Ultimately, both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of detailed information for accurate assessment of peak credits in the assessee's bank account.

---

---

Issues:
Late filing of appeals by Revenue, condonation petition, deletion of additions made under section 69A, assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96, peak credits for assessment, unexplained cash credits, directions by Hon'ble ITAT, Ahmedabad, consideration of withdrawals and deposits in bank account, non-speaking order by ld. CIT(A), necessity of necessary details for peak credits.

Late Filing of Appeals and Condonation:
The Revenue filed appeals against separate orders of ld. CIT(A) for assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96, which were filed late. A condonation petition was submitted, and after due consideration, the delay was condoned, and the appeals were admitted for hearing.

Deletion of Additions under Section 69A:
The Revenue contested the deletion of additions made under section 69A by the CIT(A) for both assessment years. The CIT(A) had deleted a portion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer, leading to the Revenue's appeal.

Peak Credits and Unexplained Cash Credits:
The case involved the assessment of an individual for the assessment year 1994-95. The Assessing Officer made additions based on unexplained deposits in the bank account. The CIT(A) considered only the peak credits as unexplained cash credits, leading to the deletion of a portion of the additions.

Directions by Hon'ble ITAT, Ahmedabad:
The Hon'ble ITAT, Ahmedabad set aside the Assessing Officer's order, directing a fresh assessment considering the peak deposits in the bank account. The Assessing Officer then made additions based on lack of information regarding the cheques issued and deposited by the assessee.

Consideration of Withdrawals and Deposits in Bank Account:
The Assessing Officer's assessment was challenged before the CIT(A), who considered both withdrawals and deposits in the bank account. The CIT(A) only treated peak credits as unexplained cash credits, leading to the deletion of a portion of the additions.

Non-Speaking Order and Necessity of Details:
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order, arguing that a non-speaking order was passed without necessary details of persons related to cheques deposited and issued by the assessee. The Tribunal agreed that the CIT(A) did not have sufficient information and remanded the matter back for a fresh speaking order.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed both appeals for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity of obtaining necessary details to determine peak credits in the assessee's bank account for a fair assessment.

---