Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained when the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds to cover investment in shares yielding exempt income, and whether Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 could be invoked on the facts of the case.
Analysis: The assessee had substantial share capital, reserves and other interest-free funds available during the relevant years, and those funds were sufficient to cover the investments in shares. In such a situation, no presumption could be drawn that borrowed funds were used for the investment merely because exempt income was earned. Disallowance under section 14A requires a nexus between the expenditure and the exempt income, and where the investment is supported by own interest-free funds, the interest claim cannot be disallowed on the basis of presumed diversion of borrowed funds. On these facts, Rule 8D had no application.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 14A was not sustainable and the additions made for both assessment years were deleted.