CENVAT credit reversal with interest and outward transportation credit were treated as admissible for the relevant period.

Reversal of CENVAT credit with interest was treated as non-availment for purposes of Notification No. 1/2006 where the credit related to services received before the notified cut-off date, so the benefit of the notification was not denied and penalty was not imposed in view of bona fide belief. CENVAT credit on outward transportation services was also admissible for the relevant period, as the then prevailing legal position recognised such credit before 01.04.2008. The impugned order was set aside and the assessee received full relief.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether reversal of CENVAT credit with interest, where the credit related to services received before the notified cut-off date but paid after that date, disentitled the assessee from the benefit of Notification No. 1/2006 and attracted penalty; (ii) Whether CENVAT credit on outward transportation services was admissible for the relevant period.

Issue (i): Whether reversal of CENVAT credit with interest, where the credit related to services received before the notified cut-off date but paid after that date, disentitled the assessee from the benefit of Notification No. 1/2006 and attracted penalty.

Analysis: The credit in question related to input services received before 01.03.2006, and the assessee had utilized it for service tax on services rendered prior to that date. The credit was later reversed along with interest. On that basis, the credit was treated as not having been availed for the purpose of the notification. The assessee's conduct was held to be under a bona fide belief, and the case did not warrant penal consequences.

Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 1/2006 was not denied on this ground, and penalty was not imposable.

Issue (ii): Whether CENVAT credit on outward transportation services was admissible for the relevant period.

Analysis: The question was covered by the then prevailing legal position that outward transportation service qualified for CENVAT credit for the relevant period prior to 01.04.2008.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to CENVAT credit on outward transportation services for the relevant period.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed, resulting in complete relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Reversal of wrongly or conditionally availed CENVAT credit with interest can be treated as non-availment for the purpose of a notification-based benefit, and credit on outward transportation services was admissible for the relevant period.

---