Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (6) TMI 437 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court Upholds Deductions for Section 80HHC: Assessing Export Profits The court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding that deductions under section 80HHC should be calculated based on net receipts included in business ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court Upholds Deductions for Section 80HHC: Assessing Export Profits

                            The court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding that deductions under section 80HHC should be calculated based on net receipts included in business profits. The court determined that 90% of the net commission should be deducted for the purpose of claiming deductions on exports, aligning with the interpretation that the deduction applies to net receipts included in the profits of the business. The appellate authorities were found to have correctly applied legal principles and did not consider irrelevant circumstances, ensuring accurate computation of export profits for section 80HHC deductions.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether wages, appraisal charges, repairs, and renewals charges received by the assessee should be reduced by 90% from the profits and gains of business as per Explanation (baa) read with section 80HHC(3)(c) of the Act for the purpose of granting deduction under section 80HHC(1).
                            2. Whether the appellate authorities erred in considering irrelevant circumstances like direct nexus between payments and receipts instead of adopting the mandatory method of computation prescribed under section 80HHC of the Act for claiming deductions on exports.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Reduction of Wages, Appraisal Charges, Repairs, and Renewals Charges by 90% from Profits
                            The Revenue contended that the receipts such as wages, appraisal charges, fixed deposits, and other amounts should be reduced from the profits of business for the purpose of section 80HHC deduction. The legislative intent, as per the Revenue, was to consider gross income from commission and not net commission for deduction purposes. The legislative amendment clarified that "profits of the business" for section 80HHC would exclude receipts by way of brokerage, commission, interest, rent, charges, or any similar nature, with an ad hoc 10% deduction for expenses incurred in earning these incomes.

                            Conversely, the respondent-assessee argued, supported by the decision in CIT v. Gokuldas Exports, that the net commission should be considered. The court examined the relevant provisions and judicial pronouncements, including the Supreme Court's interpretation in CIT v. Lakshmi Machine Works and Hero Exports v. CIT. It was established that the term "profits of the business" should exclude 90% of the net receipts (gross receipts minus related expenses) from the profits and gains of business.

                            The court concluded that 90% of the net commission should be deducted, aligning with the interpretation that the deduction applies to net receipts included in the profits of the business.

                            Issue 2: Consideration of Irrelevant Circumstances
                            The Revenue argued that the appellate authorities incorrectly considered irrelevant factors such as the direct nexus between payments and receipts, which deviated from the mandatory computation method prescribed under section 80HHC. The appellate authorities, however, relied on the principle that the computation of business profits under section 80HHC should first consider the profits computed under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" as per sections 28 to 44D.

                            The court referred to the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT v. Shri Ram Honda Power Equip, which emphasized the two-step process: first, computing the business profits under sections 28 to 44D, and second, deducting 90% of specified receipts from the computed profits. This approach ensures that only net interest (gross interest minus expenses incurred to earn such interest) is considered for deduction, thereby preventing the distortion of export profits.

                            The court affirmed that the appellate authorities correctly applied the legal principles and did not consider irrelevant circumstances. The deduction method adopted was consistent with the statutory framework and judicial precedents, ensuring accurate computation of export profits for section 80HHC deductions.

                            Conclusion:
                            The court upheld the appellate authorities' decisions, confirming that the deductions under section 80HHC should be based on net receipts included in business profits. The substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the assessee, and the appeals were dismissed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found