Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the loss on sale of Government securities held by a co-operative bank as investments was allowable as business loss, or whether it was to be treated as capital loss.
Analysis: The assessee consistently classified the Government securities as investments in its books and in its income-tax return and valued them at cost. The precedents relied on by the assessee and the CBDT circular dealing with banks were distinguished on the ground that they proceeded on securities being treated as stock-in-trade or on notional diminution in value, whereas the present dispute concerned actual loss on sale of securities that had been consistently shown as investments. The question whether a security is stock-in-trade or a capital asset was treated as one of fact, and on the facts of the case the securities were held to be investments and not trading assets.
Conclusion: The loss was not allowable as business loss and was correctly treated as capital loss.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue succeeded, and the assessment order was restored to the extent of disallowance of the claimed business loss on sale of Government securities.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a bank consistently treats Government securities as investments rather than stock-in-trade, an actual loss on their sale is to be characterised according to that investment character and not automatically allowed as business loss.