Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued for reopening of assessment under section 148 was liable to be interfered with at the writ stage, including the contention that it was based on a mere change of opinion and that reasons need not be furnished before reassessment proceedings.
Analysis: The assessment had already been completed for the relevant year, and the Income-tax Officer issued notice on the basis of escapement of income. The Court held that, at the stage of issuance of notice, it was not necessary to specify the exact item of escaped income or the source of such income. The assessee could raise the plea of change of opinion and other objections before the Income-tax Officer in the reassessment proceedings. The Court also noted that the jurisdictional requirement under section 148 had been complied with and that sanction under section 151 had been obtained.
Conclusion: The notice under section 148 was not liable to be quashed at this stage, and the writ petition was without merit.
Final Conclusion: Interference with the reopening notice was declined, and the challenge to the reassessment proceedings failed.
Ratio Decidendi: At the stage of issuance of a reassessment notice, the assessing authority need not disclose the specific item or source of escaped income, and a writ court will not interfere where the statutory preconditions, including sanction where required, have been satisfied.