Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appellate Tribunal Grants Charitable Registration for Animal Welfare Trust</h1> <h3>Snekalaya for Animals Versus Income-tax Officer, Company Ward-I</h3> Snekalaya for Animals Versus Income-tax Officer, Company Ward-I - TMI Issues:Denial of registration under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Coimbatore based on the charitable purpose of the Trust related to welfare of dogs and taking care of sick animals.Analysis:The assessee-Trust applied for registration under Section 12A of the Act, with the main objects focusing on helping orphan children, providing free food to the hungry and poor, offering medical treatment and food to animals, and various other charitable activities. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Coimbatore, denied registration citing that the welfare of dogs and care for sick animals did not align with the charitable purpose as defined in Section 2(15) of the Act. The CIT's narrow interpretation led to the refusal of registration based on the specific objects related to animals in the Trust's deed.The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal challenged the CIT's decision, arguing that the welfare of dogs and care for sick animals should be considered charitable under Section 2(15) of the Act. The Tribunal examined the broader concept of 'charitable purpose,' emphasizing that charities must serve the public benefit and that public benefit is central to charitable work. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of public benefit in determining charitable status and the special nature of charities in society.The Tribunal referred to the Charities Act, 2006 of the United Kingdom, which includes the advancement of animal welfare as a charitable purpose. It emphasized that activities directed towards preventing cruelty to animals or relieving their suffering are considered charitable. Associations promoting kindness, providing veterinary care, and re-homing mistreated animals are extensions of charities serving general public utility. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the Trust's objects related to animal welfare fell within the scope of 'general public utility' and should be considered charitable under Section 2(15) of the Act.As a result, the Tribunal set aside the CIT's order and directed the grant of registration sought by the assessee-Trust under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, overturning the denial of registration based on the charitable purpose related to animal welfare activities.