Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (6) TMI 229 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allocates corporate membership fee over ten years, deeming it revenue expenditure The tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the Revenue, directing the apportionment of the corporate membership fee of Rs.15 lakhs over ten years. The ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal allocates corporate membership fee over ten years, deeming it revenue expenditure

                            The tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the Revenue, directing the apportionment of the corporate membership fee of Rs.15 lakhs over ten years. The expenditure was deemed revenue and prepaid in nature, requiring proportional write-off over the membership period. The decision was based on the analysis that the membership provided enduring benefits over multiple years, falling under the category of prepaid expenditure rather than capital expenditure.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.15 lakhs being corporate membership fee paid to Bangalore Club.

                            Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 15 Lakhs as Corporate Membership Fee:
                            Background:
                            - The assessee, a Private Limited company engaged in property development/real estate management, claimed Rs.15 lakhs as revenue expenditure for corporate membership fee paid to Bangalore Club.
                            - The AO treated this as capital expenditure, arguing it provided an enduring benefit to the assessee.

                            Arguments by the Assessee:
                            - The payment was made out of business expediency to foster business relations and improve prospects.
                            - It provided a venue for meetings, facilitating business discussions and client entertainment.
                            - The fee was non-refundable, and no capital asset or enduring benefit was acquired.
                            - Cited case laws supporting the view that such expenditure is revenue in nature:
                            - Otis Elevator Co. (India) Ltd. v. CIT
                            - Gujarat State Export Corporation Ltd. v. CIT
                            - CIT v. Sundaram Industries Ltd.
                            - JCIT v. M/s. Cabot India Ltd.
                            - DCIT v. Kodak India Ltd.
                            - Engineers India Ltd.

                            Arguments by the Revenue:
                            - The first appellate authority erred in allowing the payment as revenue expenditure.
                            - The payment provided an enduring benefit and should be treated as capital expenditure.

                            Tribunal's Analysis:
                            - Revenue Expenditure: Defined as expenditure incurred for earning income for the previous year, with benefits exhausted within that year.
                            - Capital Expenditure: Involves bringing into existence an asset or advantage of enduring benefit.
                            - Prepaid Expenditure: Incurred for benefits/services over multiple years, paid in a lump sum in a previous year.

                            Corporate Membership Analysis:
                            - Corporate membership of Bangalore Club entitles the company to nominate directors/executives to use club facilities for ten years, without voting rights or management participation.
                            - The fee paid is non-refundable, and benefits extend over the membership period.

                            Accounting Standards:
                            - AS 26: Intangible assets should be amortized over their useful life, presumed not to exceed ten years.
                            - Materiality Concept: If the cost is significant relative to the company's financials, it should be apportioned over the membership period.

                            Conclusion:
                            - The Rs.15 lakhs paid for corporate membership should be apportioned over ten years, not written off entirely in the year of payment.
                            - The expenditure is revenue and prepaid in nature, requiring proportional write-off over the membership period.

                            Relevant Case Laws:
                            - Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT: Non-compete fees spread over the agreement period.
                            - Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd. v. CIT: Membership of Bombay Stock Exchange as an intangible asset eligible for depreciation.

                            Order:
                            - The appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed, directing the apportionment of the corporate membership fee over ten years.

                            Appreciation:
                            - The tribunal acknowledged the detailed arguments presented by both the Ld. DR and the Ld. AR.

                            Result:
                            - The appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found