Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, including on merits and limitation, in respect of the demand raised by denying the benefit of the exemption notification.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE was linked to goods exempted from customs duty under the relevant customs notification and the additional duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act. The goods supplied for a mega power project were covered by Notification No. 21/2002-Cus, and that notification did not make its benefit conditional upon the Exim Policy in the manner suggested by the Revenue. The record also indicated prior correspondence and disclosure of the clearance position, which supported the plea that the demand was prima facie time-barred. On these materials, the applicant established a strong case both on merits and on limitation.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalties was waived, and the stay petitions were allowed in favour of the assessee.