TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court affirms Tribunal's decision on share transactions, remits to Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.</h1> <h3>M/S Sikka Paper Mills Limited & Others Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax </h3> M/S Sikka Paper Mills Limited & Others Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - TMI Issues:Appeal against Tribunal's order allowing revenue's appeal and remitting matter to Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of addition on share application money.Analysis:The High Court heard two appeals raising common issues and delivered a common judgment. The appeals were filed under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act against the Tribunal's order allowing the revenue's appeal and remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Assessing Officer had made additions on share application money for two companies, questioning their genuineness. The CIT (Appeal) had earlier allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the addition, which was then challenged by the revenue before the Tribunal.The Tribunal observed that the identity of the share holders was not established to ascertain the genuineness of the transactions. The Assessing Officer had issued commissions for inquiries, but no confirmation of the companies' existence was found. Hence, the Tribunal remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer for a fresh examination. The appellant argued that the Tribunal could have decided the matter itself, citing relevant case laws. However, the respondent contended that the Assessing Officer had taken due care and caution in conducting inquiries.The High Court noted that the Tribunal's remand was justified as the identity of the investing companies was not established. The Tribunal's decision to remit the matter for fresh consideration was upheld, emphasizing that all issues, including the genuineness of the transactions, needed to be re-examined by the Assessing Officer. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial questions of law arose for consideration, and all issues remained open for the Assessing Officer to decide.In conclusion, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to remit the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need to establish the genuineness of the share transactions. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that all issues were open for the Assessing Officer to address, and no substantial questions of law were found to be raised.
TaxTMI 