Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court affirms Tribunal's decisions for assessee, granting relief on depreciation, capital computation, deductions, and exemptions.

        Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus HMT Limited

        Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus HMT Limited - [1993] 199 ITR 235, 108 CTR 215, 65 TAXMANN 292 Issues Involved:
        1. Depreciation on value of roads, walls, and fences.
        2. Inclusion of work-in-progress, machinery, and equipment in transit and under erection in the computation of capital for relief u/s 80J.
        3. Deduction u/s 35 of capital represented by work-in-progress and machinery in transit and under erection in the assessee's research division.
        4. Exemption u/s 80J on commercial profits.

        Summary:

        Issue 1: Depreciation on Value of Roads, Walls, and Fences
        The High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's decision that the assessee is entitled to depreciation on the value of roads, walls, and fences. This decision follows the precedent set in CIT v. Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. [1984] 150 ITR 23 and the Supreme Court's view in CIT v. Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing Co. Ltd. [1992] 196 ITR 149, where roads within factory premises are considered part of the building. The question is answered in the affirmative and against the Revenue.

        Issue 2: Inclusion in Computation of Capital for Relief u/s 80J
        The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision to include the value of work-in-progress, machinery, and equipment in transit and under erection in the computation of capital for relief u/s 80J. This follows the decision in Ravi Machine Tools (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [1978] 114 ITR 459. The question is answered in the affirmative and against the Revenue.

        Issue 3: Deduction u/s 35 for Work-in-Progress and Machinery in Transit
        The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision allowing deduction u/s 35 of the capital represented by work-in-progress and machinery in transit and under erection in the assessee's research division. This decision is consistent with the court's earlier rulings. The question is answered in the affirmative and against the Revenue.

        Issue 4: Exemption u/s 80J on Commercial Profits
        The court provided a detailed consideration of the fourth issue. The assessee claimed relief u/s 80J based on commercial profits, not profits computed under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal upheld this claim, relying on earlier orders and decisions, including CIT v. Patiala Flour Mills Co. P. Ltd. [1981] 127 ITR 301 and the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Patiala Flour Mills Co. P. Ltd. [1978] 115 ITR 640. The court discussed the interpretation of section 80J, emphasizing that profits and gains for the purpose of this section should be computed in the same manner as for determining total income chargeable to tax. The court rejected the Revenue's contention that deductions for depreciation and investment allowances must be made from the unit's total income. The decision aligns with the Supreme Court's rulings in Rajapalayam Mills Ltd. v. CIT [1978] 115 ITR 777 and the Calcutta High Court's observation in CIT v. Orient Paper Mills Ltd. [1983] 139 ITR 763. The fourth question is answered in the affirmative and against the Revenue.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found