TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal decision on Customs Act interest upheld; no recovery without notice. Importer assurance not binding.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) Versus M/s JAIN EXPORTS PVT LTD</h3> COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) Versus M/s JAIN EXPORTS PVT LTD - 2012 (284) E.L.T. 642 (Bom.) Issues:1. Whether Tribunal was justified in dropping the demand of interest under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962 for delay in payment of duty without a Show Cause NoticeRs.2. Whether Tribunal was correct in holding that Revenue shall not levy interest despite the importer assuring to pay interest before the Commissioner (Appeals)Rs.Analysis:Issue 1:The appeal by the Revenue under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 challenged the decision of the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the demand of interest under Section 28AA. The Tribunal concluded that interest under Section 28AA is applicable only when duty is determined under Section 28(2) after a notice under Section 28(1) is issued for short levy or non-levy of duty. As no such notice was issued in this case, the Tribunal held that Section 28AA does not apply. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that interest can only be charged if the statute explicitly provides for it. The Court clarified that interest was not recoverable under Section 28AA for the period before 13/7/2006, as there was no provision for it at that time. The Court cited a previous judgment stating that charging interest is a substantive provision and can only be applied if the statute contains a substantive provision for it.Issue 2:Regarding the second issue raised, the High Court determined that the assurance by the importer to pay interest does not prevent them from claiming that no interest is payable under the statute. The Court clarified that the Tribunal's decision that interest is not recoverable under the Customs Act does not prevent the importer from honoring its commitment to pay interest voluntarily. Additionally, the Court mentioned that the Revenue can still pursue civil remedies to enforce any commitment made by the importer. Ultimately, the Court found no substantial question of law raised by either of the issues and dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, with no order as to costs.This detailed analysis of the judgment provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal issues involved, the arguments presented by both parties, and the reasoning behind the High Court's decision.
TaxTMI 