TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows appeals on car purchase cash payment & loss set off issues, directs reevaluation.</h1> <h3>Faisal Abbas Versus DCIT </h3> Faisal Abbas Versus DCIT - TMI Issues:1. Addition of cash payment for purchase of car.2. Disallowance of set off of brought forward business loss for A.Y. 2002-03.3. Disallowance of set off of brought forward business loss for A.Y. 2007-08.Issue 1: Addition of Cash Payment for Purchase of Car (A.Y. 2002-03):The appellant contested the addition of Rs.2,62,184 paid in cash for the purchase of a car out of the total disallowance of Rs.5,55,284. The appellant claimed to have contributed the cash from earnings, with the remaining amount financed through a loan. The AO disallowed the contribution, leading to the appeal. The tribunal noted that the appellant failed to file the return within the prescribed time, hindering the verification of the claimed source of funds. The tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's explanation and financial records, justifying the sustained addition.Issue 2: Disallowance of Set Off of Brought Forward Business Loss for A.Y. 2002-03:The appellant sought to set off a business loss from A.Y. 2001-02 against the current year's income. The AO and CIT(A) denied the set off, citing the return filing timeline. However, the tribunal held that once a loss is determined in a filed return, the set off is permissible in subsequent years, irrespective of filing deadlines. The tribunal emphasized the application of Sec. 80 and Sec. 139(3) for loss carryforwards, allowing the set off in this case and directing the AO to reconsider the matter.Issue 3: Disallowance of Set Off of Brought Forward Business Loss for A.Y. 2007-08:The appellant contested the disallowance of setting off the business loss from A.Y. 2001-02 against the current year's income. The tribunal reiterated the principles established in the A.Y. 2002-03 case, emphasizing the mandatory set off of brought forward losses against subsequent year's income. However, due to missing income details for A.Y. 2003-04 to 2006-07, the tribunal directed the AO to review the matter, ensuring proper compliance with the set off provisions and granting the appellant a fair hearing.In conclusion, the tribunal partially allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, addressing the issues of cash payment addition for the car purchase and the disallowance of set off of brought forward business losses for both A.Y. 2002-03 and A.Y. 2007-08. The judgments emphasized the legal requirements for loss set offs and directed the AO to reevaluate the matters in accordance with the law and after providing the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to present their case.
TaxTMI 