Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (5) TMI 294 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal invalidates assessment under section 153C, deletes additions related to share application money. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in ITA No.92/LKW/2011 by declaring the assessment under section 153C read with section 153A invalid and deleting the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal invalidates assessment under section 153C, deletes additions related to share application money.

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal in ITA No.92/LKW/2011 by declaring the assessment under section 153C read with section 153A invalid and deleting the additions related to share application money. In ITA No.93/LKW/2011, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by confirming the disallowance of expenses while ruling in favor of the assessee on other issues.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of assessment under section 153A read with section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Addition of share application money under section 68 of the Act.
                          3. Disallowance of expenses under various heads.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of Assessment under Section 153A read with Section 153C:

                          The primary issue in these appeals is the validity of the assessment framed consequent to the notice issued under section 153A read with section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that the initiation of proceedings under section 153C read with section 153A was invalid as there was no requisite satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer of the searched parties before handing over the relevant materials to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the search was conducted by the Central Excise Department on M/s Chandra Kamal Corporation and M/s Virat Overseas Pvt. Ltd., and documents were seized. However, no material was received by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the assessee from the Assessing Officer of the searched parties after valid satisfaction recorded by him.

                          The Tribunal emphasized that for initiating action under section 153C, there must be a satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the searched party that the seized material pertains to the assessee. It was found that no such satisfaction was recorded, and the proceedings under section 153C were initiated based on a letter received by the Additional CIT. The Tribunal held that without initiating action under section 153A upon the searched party, action under section 153C cannot be initiated upon another person. Consequently, the assessment framed under section 153C read with section 153A was not sustainable in the eyes of law and was knocked down.

                          2. Addition of Share Application Money under Section 68:

                          On the merits of the case, the Tribunal addressed the addition of Rs.51,70,000 made under section 68 of the Act, which pertains to the share application money received by the assessee. The assessee placed heavy reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Lovely Exports Pvt. Ltd., where it was held that if the share application money is received from alleged bogus shareholders whose names are given to the Assessing Officer, the Department is free to reopen their individual assessments but cannot add the same in the hands of the assessee-company. The Tribunal agreed with this view and deleted the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) on account of share application money.

                          3. Disallowance of Expenses under Various Heads:

                          In ITA No.93/LKW/2011, an additional ground was raised regarding the disallowance of expenses aggregating to Rs.1,62,000 under various heads. No argument was raised by the assessee's counsel on this issue. The Tribunal carefully perused the order of the CIT(A) and found no infirmity therein, thus confirming the disallowance of expenses.

                          Conclusion:

                          In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee in ITA No.92/LKW/2011 by knocking down the assessment framed under section 153C read with section 153A and deleting the additions made on account of share application money. In ITA No.93/LKW/2011, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by confirming the disallowance of expenses while deciding other issues in favor of the assessee.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found