Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court affirms Tribunal's decision on Income Tax Act procedures, stresses notice issuance and participation importance.</h1> <h3>The Commissioner Of Income Tax Alld And Anr. Versus Sh. Bihari Lal Agrawal</h3> The Commissioner Of Income Tax Alld And Anr. Versus Sh. Bihari Lal Agrawal - [2012] 346 ITR 67 Issues:1. Consideration of Section 292BB of the Income Tax Act while allowing additional ground of appeal.2. Applicability of the judgment of Hotel Blue Moon in the case.3. Participation in assessment proceedings and raising of issues.Analysis:1. The first issue revolves around whether the CIT (A) and the Tribunal erred in not considering Section 292BB of the Income Tax Act while allowing the assessee to raise an additional ground of appeal. The Tribunal found that no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act had been served upon the assessee during the block assessment. The law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hotel Blue Moon was cited, emphasizing the importance of proper notice issuance. The Court further referred to a previous judgment where it was held that Section 292BB is not applicable if the authority lacked jurisdiction to proceed further and make an assessment.2. The second issue questions the applicability of the judgment of Hotel Blue Moon in the present case. The Revenue argued that the judgment was not relevant as it did not consider the provisions of Section 292BB, which was introduced after the judgment. However, the Court found that the decision in Hotel Blue Moon was indeed applicable as it established the necessity of serving a notice under Section 143(2) before proceeding with the assessment. The Tribunal's order, based on this principle, was upheld.3. The third issue pertains to the participation of the assessee in the assessment proceedings and the subsequent raising of issues. The assessee had not objected to the non-issuance of notice under Section 143(2) during the assessment proceedings but raised the issue later. The CIT (A) allowed the assessee to raise this issue, which was confirmed by the Tribunal. The Court held that since no notice was served, the assessee's participation did not waive the requirement for proper notice. Therefore, the order of the Tribunal was deemed legally sound, and the appeal was dismissed.In conclusion, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the importance of following procedural requirements such as serving notices under the Income Tax Act. The judgment highlighted the significance of proper notice issuance and participation in assessment proceedings, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.