Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of unutilized deemed CENVAT credit accumulated as on 31.03.2003 was admissible under the relevant notification and Rule 5, and whether the matter required verification of supporting documents.
Analysis: The claim was rejected below on the grounds of alleged non-production of evidence and non-compliance with the notification. The Tribunal noted that the relevant notification permitted the claim and that the cited precedents dealt with utilisation of accumulated credit after rescission, whereas the present case involved a refund claim. The Tribunal further found that the claimant's entitlement could not be finally denied without examination of the documents supporting the refund claim.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held to be admissible in principle, but the matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority for verification of the records and fresh decision.