Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent, after full discharge of export obligation under advance licences, was entitled to clear the resultant product in the domestic market while retaining the benefit of the customs exemption notifications.
Analysis: The Notifications and the Foreign Trade Policy were read together as requiring duty-free inputs imported under advance licences to be physically incorporated in the export product. The expressions used in the policy and the endorsement conditions in the notifications indicated that the resultant product was meant to be exported, including where import took place after fulfilment of export obligation. The subsequent policy provision permitting disposal of the product manufactured out of duty-free inputs was not treated as altering the textual conditions of the notifications for the period in question. The impugned order was found prima facie unsustainable, including because the Commissioner had relied on an erroneous construction of the notification conditions and on a remand order concerning the advance licences.
Conclusion: The respondent was prima facie not entitled to domestic clearance of the resultant product after availing exemption on the imported raw material, and the Revenue made out a case for stay.