Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods not intended for retail sale and cleared for free distribution required valuation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, or under Section 4 on transaction value.
Analysis: Section 4A applies where valuation is linked to MRP and the package is intended for retail sale. The goods in dispute were cleared for free distribution and were not intended for sale through the retail channel. Rule 3 of the Standard of Weight and Measurement (Package Commodity) Rules was therefore inapplicable, and MRP was not required to be affixed. The Board circular also clarified that where MRP is not required, valuation must be done under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Since the respondent valued the goods on transaction value, no interference with the appellate order was warranted.
Conclusion: Valuation under Section 4A was not required for the impugned goods, and assessment under Section 4 on transaction value was correct.