Tribunal Grants Assessee Relief: Set-off Losses, Excludes Branch Turnover, Confirms Deductions

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals on various grounds, including the set-off of losses from 10A eligible units against normal business income, exclusion of turnover of Japan and Australia branches from both export and total turnover for deduction under section 80HHE, and eligibility of new units for deduction under section 10A. The Tribunal directed the deletion of certain additions/disallowances made under Transfer Pricing and remitted some issues back to the CIT(A) for further adjudication. Overall, the Tribunal provided relief to the assessee by ruling in favor on several contested points.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance and adding back of losses of 10A units while computing income as per normal computation.
2. Addition/disallowance on account of interest under Transfer Pricing.
3. Addition/disallowance on account of consultancy expenses under Transfer Pricing.
4. Netting interest received against interest payment while reducing 90% of interest received from business income for section 80HHE.
5. Reducing expenditure in foreign exchange for the SEEPZ unit from total and export turnover while computing deduction u/s 80HHE.
6. Reducing turnover of Japan and Australia Branches only from export turnover and not from total turnover.
7. Computation of book profit and adjustments made thereunder.
8. Disallowance and adding back of losses of 10A units while computing book profit u/s 115JA.
9. Determining the status of new units as independent or expansions for 10A eligibility.
10. Set-off of losses of Sweden Branch office against other business income.
11. Manner of charging interest under section 234B.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance and Adding Back of Losses of 10A Units:
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's appeal regarding the set-off of losses from 10A eligible units against normal business income. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions, including the Pune Bench's ruling and the High Court's decision in Hindustan Unilever Ltd., affirming that section 10A provides for a deduction, not an exemption, thus allowing the set-off of losses.

2. Addition/Disallowance on Account of Interest Under Transfer Pricing:
The Tribunal addressed the addition of Rs. 64,14,387 sustained by the CIT(A) out of Rs. 3.99 crores made by the AO for interest on excess credit allowed to Associated Enterprises. The Tribunal concluded that the extension of credit to Associated Enterprises beyond the stipulated period did not constitute an "international transaction" under section 92B(1), thus directing the deletion of the addition.

3. Addition/Disallowance on Account of Consultancy Expenses Under Transfer Pricing:
The Tribunal examined the TPO's adjustment related to consultancy expenses paid to McKinsey & Co. The Tribunal found no evidence of a mutual agreement or arrangement between the assessee and its Associated Enterprises for the apportionment of costs. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the adjustment, holding that the TPO's action was based on no evidence.

4. Netting Interest Received Against Interest Payment:
The Tribunal noted that this ground was not pressed by the assessee and thus dismissed it as withdrawn.

5. Reducing Expenditure in Foreign Exchange for SEEPZ Unit:
Similarly, the Tribunal noted that this ground was not pressed by the assessee and dismissed it as withdrawn.

6. Reducing Turnover of Japan and Australia Branches:
The Tribunal agreed with the assessee that if the turnover of Japan and Australia branches was excluded from the "export turnover," it should also be excluded from the "total turnover" for computing deduction under section 80HHE. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the deduction accordingly.

7. Computation of Book Profit and Adjustments:
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had dismissed this ground as academic since the assessee was taxed under the normal provisions. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits to ensure completeness and finality of proceedings.

8. Disallowance and Adding Back of Losses of 10A Units While Computing Book Profit:
The Tribunal remitted this issue back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits, following the precedent set in the assessee's case for the previous assessment year.

9. Determining the Status of New Units:
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that the three units at Chinchwad, Akruti, and Millennium Business Park were new and independent units, not mere expansions of existing units. The Tribunal found that the units fulfilled the conditions under section 10A(2) and were eligible for deduction under section 10A.

10. Set-Off of Losses of Sweden Branch Office:
The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the set-off of losses from the Sweden branch against other business income, following the Tribunal's decision for the previous assessment year.

11. Manner of Charging Interest Under Section 234B:
The Tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the interest chargeable under section 234B, considering the Explanation 1 below section 234B(1) and the Bombay High Court's decision in Apar Industries Ltd., which allows credit for taxes paid in foreign countries.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals on most grounds, remitted some issues back to the CIT(A) for further adjudication, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals, thereby providing relief to the assessee on several contested points.

---