Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cash amounts received by the assessee in excess of Rs. 20,000 in the course of business dealings constituted a loan or deposit so as to attract section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and justify penalty.
Analysis: The parties had a continuing commercial relationship in which the assessee manufactured goods exclusively for its sister concern. The cash receipts were not shown to be a loan or deposit, were made in several instalments below the statutory threshold, and were supported by the accounts of both parties. The material showed that the payments were made to sustain the business and meet commitments during financial difficulty, rather than as borrowing or deposit-taking. In the absence of evidence indicating a loan or deposit, the statutory mischief aimed at by section 269SS was not attracted.
Conclusion: The cash receipts did not constitute a loan or deposit and section 269SS was not attracted. The penalty imposed for alleged contravention was rightly set aside, in favour of the assessee.