Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was attracted where a Hindu undivided family was a partner in the firm and the karta, in his individual capacity, received interest on amounts advanced to the firm.
Analysis: The assessment year in question was 1981-82. The issue was covered by an earlier decision of the same Court in the assessee's own case for an earlier assessment year, where it was held that section 40(b) was not attracted in such circumstances. Following that decision, the Court applied the same view to the present reference.
Conclusion: Section 40(b) was held not to be attracted, and the question was answered in the negative in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.