Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after rejecting the genuineness of sundry creditor entries in the books of account, the income could be added straightaway under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or whether the Assessing Officer ought to have proceeded under section 145(3) and made a fresh assessment under section 144.
Analysis: The disclosed names of the alleged suppliers were examined and their statements did not support the genuineness of the transactions. On the facts, the findings that the sundry creditor entries were not genuine were upheld. However, the assessment order was found to be internally inconsistent because the Assessing Officer accepted the returned profit while simultaneously treating the creditor entries as taxable cash credits without first making the assessment in the manner required after rejecting the books of account. Once the books were found unreliable, the proper course was to invoke section 145(3) and then assess the income in accordance with section 144 rather than make a straight addition under section 68.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 could not be sustained in the manner adopted by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was allowed, the assessment order and the Tribunal's order were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the books of account are rejected for lack of genuineness, the Assessing Officer must adopt the statutory procedure for best judgment assessment and cannot straightaway tax the disputed entries under section 68 without first proceeding under section 145(3) and section 144.