Waste and scrap classification upheld for worn ship chains; declared transaction value accepted absent reliable valuation basis.

Old and used ship chains imported as heavy melting scrap were treated as waste and scrap under Heading 72.04 because the import documents, inspection certificate and surrounding material showed the goods were worn out and no longer usable as chains; the department did not rebut that evidence, so classification under Heading 73.15 was unsustainable. The declared assessable value of US $ 370 per MT was also accepted because the proposed enhancement to US $ 480 per MT rested only on a presumption drawn from the value of new chains and lacked a rational or reliable valuation basis. The material therefore supported assessment as scrap on the declared value.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether old and used ship chains imported as heavy melting scrap were classifiable under Heading 72.04 as waste and scrap or under Heading 73.15 as ship chains; (ii) whether the declared assessable value of US $ 370 per MT could be enhanced to US $ 480 per MT.

Issue (i): Whether old and used ship chains imported as heavy melting scrap were classifiable under Heading 72.04 as waste and scrap or under Heading 73.15 as ship chains.

Analysis: The import documents, inspection certificate and surrounding material showed that the goods were old, used and worn out ship chains and were treated by the pre-shipment inspection agency as metallic scrap, seconds or defective goods. Section Note 8 to Section XV recognizes waste and scrap as metal goods definitely not usable as such because of breakage, cutting-up, wear or other reasons. The material on record established that the goods were no longer usable as chains, while the department did not rebut the evidence or prove that they remained usable as ship chains.

Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 72.04 as waste and scrap, and the contrary classification under Heading 73.15 was not sustainable.

Issue (ii): Whether the declared assessable value of US $ 370 per MT could be enhanced to US $ 480 per MT.

Analysis: The enhancement was based only on a presumption drawn from the supposed value of new chains and an arbitrary discount for used chains. No rational basis or reliable valuation method was shown to justify rejection of the declared value.

Conclusion: The enhancement of value was not justified and the declared value of US $ 370 per MT was to be accepted.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the goods were to be assessed as waste and scrap on the declared value, and the department's re-classification and value enhancement could not stand.

Ratio Decidendi: Where contemporaneous import documents and unrebutted inspection evidence establish that old and used goods are no longer usable as such, they are classifiable as waste and scrap, and a declared transaction value cannot be rejected on a bare presumption.

---