Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deductions towards trade discount, additional discount, freight and insurance as post-manufacturing expenses were admissible while determining the assessable value.
Analysis: The claims were supported by Chartered Accountant certificates and were verified by the Range Officer. The lower authorities found the deductions to be in order, including equalized freight and insurance on the basis of the depot sales and the composite insurance cover. The Revenue did not produce corroborative evidence to dislodge the certificates or the factual verification. In the absence of contrary evidence, the deduction of such expenses from the assessable value was justified.
Conclusion: The deductions were rightly allowed and the Revenue's objection was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders allowing deduction of post-manufacturing expenses from assessable value were sustained, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Deductions for post-removal expenses and trade discounts, when substantiated by documentary evidence and departmental verification and not disproved by the Revenue, are allowable in computing assessable value.