Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether compensation received by a partner for reduction of his share in a reconstituted firm constituted a capital receipt or a revenue receipt.
Analysis: The assessee's share in the partnership was reduced from 36 per cent. to 5 per cent., and the amount received was paid for that reduction. On the facts, there was no material to show that the assessee was carrying on the business of entering into partnerships as a trading activity. The receipt was therefore linked to impairment of an income-yielding asset, namely, the assessee's share in the firm. The facts were distinguishable from the case where compensation was received in the ordinary course of business on termination of a trading arrangement. The payment answered the character of compensation for loss of a capital asset rather than profit in the course of business.
Conclusion: The receipt of Rs. 2,05,000 was a capital receipt and not taxable as revenue income.
Ratio Decidendi: Compensation received for reduction or impairment of a partner's share in a firm, where the trading structure or income-producing apparatus is affected, is a capital receipt unless special business features show that the payment is merely a trading profit.