Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit lying unutilised on the date of switching over to the compounded levy scheme could be treated as lapsed and whether such credit could be recovered when the manufacturer was not one who had opted for exemption from payment of the whole duty.
Analysis: Rule 57F(17)(c) provided that, on 1 August 1997, credit available with manufacturers of non-alloy steel ingots and billets required to pay duty under Section 3A would lapse and could not be used for payment of duty on any excisable goods. Rule 57H(7), by contrast, applied to a manufacturer who opted for exemption from payment of the whole duty and required payment of an amount equivalent to credit allowed on inputs or finished goods lying in stock. The respondent had not opted for exemption under Rule 57H(7), but had come under the compounded levy scheme, and the unutilised credit on inputs and finished goods therefore stood lapsed under Rule 57F(17).
Conclusion: The credit could not be recovered under Rule 57H(7), and the authorities were correct in holding that the unutilised Modvat credit had lapsed under Rule 57F(17)(c). The questions of law did not arise for consideration.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the statutory scheme governing compounded levy caused the unutilised Modvat credit to lapse, leaving no recoverable demand against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: When a manufacturer governed by the compounded levy scheme falls within Rule 57F(17)(c), unutilised Modvat credit lapses by operation of the rule and cannot be recovered as if the case were one of exemption under Rule 57H(7).