1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal grants CENVAT Credit despite procedural hurdles, emphasizing substance over form.</h1> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing their factory to claim CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on input services despite invoices being ... Whether the appellant's factory can take CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid when the invoices are in the name of Head Office - CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on input services has been denied on the ground that the invoices were in the name of Head Office and Head Office was not registered as input service distributor - Tribunal in the case of Durferrit Asea (P.) Ltd. v. CCE [2010 -TMI - 77024 - CESTAT, BANGALORE] - Decided in favor of the assessee Issues Involved:1. Whether the appellant's factory can take CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid when the invoices are in the name of Head Office.Analysis:The issue at hand in this case revolves around the eligibility of the appellant's factory to claim CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on input services, despite the invoices being in the name of the Head Office. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and perusing the records, found that the appellant is entitled to avail the CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal referred to a previous case where a similar issue was addressed, emphasizing that the appellant's eligibility for the credit should not be hindered by the fact that the invoices were raised in the name of the Head Office. The Tribunal highlighted that the Commissioner's decision to deny the credit based on procedural grounds was not supported by the evidence or the show cause notice. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the provisions of Rule 7 regarding input service credit distributor registration are only applicable if the appellant intends to register as such, which was not the case here as the appellant had only one manufacturing unit. The Tribunal also confirmed that there was no evidence of any other units of the appellant in the relevant jurisdiction, further supporting the appellant's claim for the credit.In conclusion, the Tribunal held that the issue raised in this case is in line with the precedent decisions and agreed with the view that the appellant is eligible to take the CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on input services, even if the invoices were addressed to the Head Office. The Tribunal's decision underscores the importance of focusing on the substance of the claim rather than procedural technicalities, especially when the appellant's circumstances align with the relevant legal provisions and requirements.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
