Exemption notification entitlement must be reconsidered afresh when rejection ignores prior judicial directions and misapplies the governing criteria.

An authority directed to determine entitlement under a specific exemption notification must apply the earlier judicial directions and the governing notification correctly. Where the claim for an eligibility certificate was rejected by relying on cut-off date clauses without a proper fresh examination under the notification dated 6 October 1994, that rejection could not be sustained. The rejection was quashed and the matter was remanded to the State Level Committee for reconsideration in accordance with the notification and the prior directions of the Court.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order rejecting the petitioner's claim for an eligibility certificate under the notification dated October 6, 1994 could be sustained, and whether the matter required reconsideration in accordance with the earlier directions of the Court.

Analysis: The notification under section 12 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was the governing framework. The earlier order of the Court had required the authorities to examine the petitioner's entitlement under the notification dated October 6, 1994 and to extend the benefit if the petitioner was covered by that notification. The impugned decision was found to have proceeded on an incorrect approach by applying the cut-off date clauses without properly deciding the matter in the light of the earlier judicial directions. Since the relevant authority had not examined the claim strictly as required, the rejection could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The rejection of the eligibility certificate was quashed and the matter was remanded to the State Level Committee for fresh consideration under the notification dated October 6, 1994 and the earlier directions of the Court.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an authority is directed to decide entitlement under a specific exemption notification in accordance with prior judicial directions, a rejection based on an incorrect application of the notification cannot stand and the matter must be reconsidered afresh.

---