Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether gold seized during a search could be retained by the Revenue and withheld from release pending penalty proceedings, and whether payment of assessed tax and interest excluded any further liability justifying such retention.
Analysis: Section 132B(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 permits seized assets to be applied not only against existing liability but also against liability determined on completion of assessment, including penalty levied or interest payable in connection with such assessment. The provision was construed as enabling retention of the seized gold until the penalty liability, arising from the search-related proceedings, is determined, provided the assessee is in default or deemed to be in default. Payment of tax and interest under the assessment orders did not, by itself, negate the statutory basis for retention where penalty proceedings were already initiated and remained pending.
Conclusion: The request for release of the seized gold was not sustainable, and the Revenue was entitled to retain the assets until the penalty liability was determined; the issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition failed because the statutory scheme governing seized assets allowed their retention for adjustment against pending penalty-related liability, and the challenge to withholding of the gold was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Section 132B(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, seized assets may be retained and applied towards liability determined in search-related proceedings, including penalty payable in connection with such assessment, and cannot be claimed back merely because assessed tax and interest have been paid while penalty proceedings remain pending.