Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether income from vacant lands was assessable in the hands of the company under the head "Income from other sources" even though legal ownership in the lands vested in individual members of the family.
Analysis: The reference arose in respect of assessment of income from vacant lands received and enjoyed by the company after the family properties had been pooled for the company's benefit. The Court held that section 56 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is wide enough to bring to tax income of every kind not excluded from total income and that legal ownership of the underlying asset is not a necessary condition for assessment under that head. The absence of a formal conveyance did not alter the position, since the properties had been transferred for consideration in substance and the company was in possession and receiving the income. Section 60 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held inapplicable because the case concerned transfer of the property and receipt of the income by the company, not a mere transfer of income without transfer of the asset. The cited authorities on diversion of income and family arrangements were found distinguishable on the facts.
Conclusion: The income from the vacant lands was correctly assessable in the hands of the company as income from other sources, and the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For assessment under section 56 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, actual receipt and enjoyment of income by the assessee can suffice even if legal title in the asset remains with others, and section 60 does not apply where the asset itself has effectively been transferred for consideration.