Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to redemption of the gold bars under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, and whether absolute confiscation and penalty for smuggling were justified.
Analysis: The petitioner was a foreign national and did not satisfy the eligibility conditions under the Foreign Trade (Exemption from application of rules in certain cases) Order, 1993, which restricted import of gold in baggage to passengers of Indian origin or passengers holding a valid passport issued under the Passport Act, 1967. The gold was concealed, not declared at the green channel, and the conduct amounted to an attempt to smuggle prohibited goods. In these circumstances, the goods were liable to confiscation under the Customs Act, 1962, and the plea for redemption under Section 125 could not be accepted.
Conclusion: The challenge to absolute confiscation and penalty failed, and the petitioner was not entitled to redemption of the seized gold bars.