Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee had made out a prima facie case for stay of recovery of the outstanding demand pending disposal of the appeal, in the context of the dispute on existence of a permanent establishment in India and attribution of profits thereto.
Analysis: The demand arose from an assessment treating the liaison office activities as exceeding preparatory or auxiliary functions and suggesting the existence of a permanent establishment in India. The Tribunal noted that the dispute whether sufficient material existed to establish a permanent establishment was debatable, and that the Assessing Officer had called for details but treated the material as sketchy. It also noted that the profit attribution had been estimated by applying a 10% gross profit rate and by relying on Rule 10(iii) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, ignoring the assessee's disclosed global profit margin. On these facts, the Tribunal found that the assessee had shown a prima facie good case on merits.
Conclusion: Recovery of the demand was stayed in favour of the assessee, subject to payment of specified instalments, operation of the stay for 180 days or till disposal of the appeal, and the condition against seeking adjournments except for unavoidable circumstances.