Default bail and commercial quantity under NDPS: specific opium-derivative entry displaced the general mixture rule.

Where the seized substance, on the chemical analyst report and the applicable notification, fell within the specific entry for opium derivatives under the NDPS Act, it was treated as commercial quantity and not as a neutral mixture governed by the general mixture entry. The Court held that the specific opium-derivative notification entry prevailed over the general entry for mixtures or preparations, so the extended period under Section 36-A(4) applied instead of the ordinary sixty-day rule under Section 167(2) CrPC. On that basis, default bail granted by the trial court was not sustainable and was liable to be set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether bail granted under the proviso to Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 could be sustained when the seized substance, on the chemical analyst report and the relevant notification, constituted a commercial quantity of an opium derivative under the NDPS Act.

Analysis: The chemical analyst report showed traces of heroin, Monoacetyl Morphine and other opium alkaloids in the samples, with morphine content above 0.2 per cent. The Court distinguished the authorities dealing with pure drug content in mixtures and held that the present material did not disclose a neutral mixture like sugar or other inert substance. On the facts, the seized substance fell within the definition of opium derivative under Section 2(xvi)(e) of the NDPS Act, and the specific notification entry for opium derivatives governed the case. Entry 239, dealing generally with mixtures or preparations, was held inapplicable because the specific entry for opium derivatives controlled the field. Consequently, the offence had to be treated as one involving commercial quantity, attracting the extended period under Section 36-A(4) of the NDPS Act rather than the ordinary sixty-day rule under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Conclusion: The bail orders were contrary to law and were liable to be set aside; the accused were not entitled to default bail on the basis applied by the trial court.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the seized material, on the chemical report and the applicable notification, falls within a specific narcotic entry as a commercial quantity, default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is governed by the extended period prescribed by Section 36-A(4) of the NDPS Act.

---