TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D is leviable in respect of investments which did not yield exempt income in the year, and whether the Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals) correctly applied Rule 8D to compute disallowance.
Analysis: Section 14A addresses disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in total income; section 57(iii) principles indicate actual receipt of exempt income is not a prerequisite for considering expenditure incurred for earning that income. The phrase "expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income" requires a direct or indirect nexus between the expenditure and the exempt income. Where substantial investments exist, an inference that some expenditure was incurred may arise, but proper factfinding on managerial time and other attributable expenses is required. Neither the Assessing Officer nor the Commissioner (Appeals) conducted a sufficiently detailed enquiry into expenditures attributable to the investments or managerial efforts; therefore further examination is necessary applying the approach in Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Maxopp Investments Ltd., and Jindal Photo Ltd., and computing disallowance under Rule 8D if warranted.
Conclusion: Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D may be applied even where no exempt income was actually received, provided a nexus between expenditure and exempt income is established; however, the matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh enquiry and determination in accordance with law, after affording the assessee an opportunity of being heard.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure attributable to earning income exempt from tax is assessable for disallowance under section 14A even if no exempt income was actually received in the year, subject to establishment of a nexus by appropriate factfinding; where earlier authorities have not made adequate enquiry, the matter must be restored for fresh examination including computation under Rule 8D where applicable.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
