Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>High Court: Exchange rate loss non-deductible for remittances. Acquisition cost spread for capital gains.</h1> <h3>Goodricke Group Limited (successors-in-interest To Leesh River Tea Co. Limited) Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax</h3> The High Court held that the loss incurred due to exchange rate fluctuations in remittance of profit and dividends is not an allowable deduction. ... Business Expenditure, Capital Gains, Shares And Securities Issues Involved:1. Allowability of loss incurred due to fluctuation of exchange rates in remittance of profit.2. Allowability of loss incurred in remittance of dividend.3. Computation of long-term capital gains arising out of the transfer of original shares and the cost of acquisition of original and bonus shares.Detailed Analysis:1. Allowability of Loss Incurred Due to Fluctuation of Exchange Rates in Remittance of Profit:The first issue relates to the assessee's claim of Rs. 1,71,066 as a loss due to exchange rate fluctuations while remitting profits from India to its UK office. The Tribunal disallowed this claim, stating that the loss was not incurred for the purpose of earning income and was not laid out for the purpose of the business. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. [1979] 116 ITR 1 (SC), which distinguished between losses on revenue account and capital account. The Tribunal concluded that the remitted surplus funds did not constitute a trading asset or circulating capital and were intended for distribution as dividends or investment outside India. Consequently, the loss was not considered a trading loss or incidental to business operations. The High Court, following its earlier decision in Goodriche Group Ltd. (No. 1) v. CIT [1993] 201 ITR 261, answered the first question in the negative and in favor of the assessee, thereby disallowing the deduction.2. Allowability of Loss Incurred in Remittance of Dividend:The second issue pertains to the assessee's claim of Rs. 368 as a loss due to exchange rate fluctuations while remitting dividends from India to the UK. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal rejected this claim on the same grounds as the remittance of profits. The High Court applied the same principle, determining that the loss suffered due to exchange rate fluctuations on remittance of dividends was not allowable as a deduction. Thus, the second question was also answered in the negative and in favor of the assessee.3. Computation of Long-Term Capital Gains and Cost of Acquisition of Original and Bonus Shares:The third issue involves the computation of long-term capital gains from the transfer of original shares and the cost of acquisition of original and bonus shares. The assessee-company acquired 1,200 equity shares of Duncan Bros. and Co. Ltd. and was later allotted bonus shares. The entire block of shares was sold, and the assessee contended that the cost of original shares should be taken as the actual cost and the cost of bonus shares should be determined by spreading the cost of original shares over both original and bonus shares. The Tribunal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities, rejected this method.The High Court referenced several precedents, including CIT v. Gold Mohore Investment Co. Ltd. [1968] 68 ITR 213 (SC), Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd. [1964] 52 ITR 567 (SC), and Smt. Protima Roy [1982] 138 ITR 536 (Cal), which established that the cost of original shares should be spread over the original and bonus shares collectively to determine the average price. The High Court concluded that the method adopted by the lower authorities and upheld by the Tribunal was correct. Therefore, the third question was answered in the affirmative and in favor of the Revenue.Conclusion:The High Court ruled:1. The loss incurred due to exchange rate fluctuations in remittance of profit is not an allowable deduction.2. The loss incurred in remittance of dividends is not an allowable deduction.3. The cost of acquisition of original shares should be spread over both original and bonus shares for computing long-term capital gains.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found