Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 57CC(1) could be invoked when the same final product was partly cleared on payment of duty and partly cleared without payment of duty under an exemption notification.
Analysis: Rule 57CC(1) applies only where there are distinct final products, one dutiable and another exempted or chargeable at nil rate. The clearances in question were of the same manufactured goods, namely caustic soda flakes, and it was not permissible to treat part of the quantity of the same final product as one final product and the remaining quantity as another final product merely because some clearances were duty paid and some were exempted. The exemption notifications were correctly understood by the Tribunal in the light of the nature of the final products.
Conclusion: Rule 57CC(1) was not attracted, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The dismissal of the appeal left undisturbed the Tribunal's view that no excise duty consequence could follow on the footing that different clearances of the same product constituted different final products.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the same final product is cleared partly on payment of duty and partly under an exemption, Rule 57CC(1) is inapplicable unless there are separate dutiable and exempt final products.