Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (9) TMI 591 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court rules Section 234D not retrospective, interest on excess refunds from regular assessment date. The court held that Section 234D of the Income-tax Act applies from June 1, 2003, and cannot be retrospectively applied to assessment years prior to its ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court rules Section 234D not retrospective, interest on excess refunds from regular assessment date.

                          The court held that Section 234D of the Income-tax Act applies from June 1, 2003, and cannot be retrospectively applied to assessment years prior to its introduction. However, if the regular assessment is completed after this date, the provision applies. The court determined that interest on excess refunds is applicable from the date of the regular assessment if completed after the introduction of Section 234D. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, setting aside previous orders and holding the assessee liable to pay interest on the excess refund.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Applicability of Section 234D of the Income-tax Act for assessment years prior to its introduction.
                          2. Levy of interest under Section 234D for periods subsequent to its introduction when the assessment year is prior to the introduction.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Applicability of Section 234D for Assessment Years Prior to its Introduction

                          Facts and Arguments:
                          - The assessee, a finance company, filed its income return for the assessment year 2001-02 and later revised it. The return was processed, and an assessment order was passed.
                          - The Assessing Officer levied interest under Section 234D for excess refund.
                          - The assessee argued that Section 234D, introduced on June 1, 2003, should not apply retrospectively to assessment years before its introduction.
                          - The Revenue contended that the date of levying interest is what matters, not the assessment year.

                          Legal Precedents and Judgment:
                          - The court referred to various judgments, including CIT v. South Indian Bank Ltd. and CIT v. Kerala Chemicals and Proteins Ltd., which held that Section 234D applies from June 1, 2003, and interest can only be levied from that date.
                          - The court also cited cases like Sree Karpagambal Mills Ltd. v. CIT and Karimtharuvi Tea Estate Ltd. v. State of Kerala, emphasizing that laws effective from a specific date cannot be applied retrospectively unless explicitly stated.
                          - The court concluded that Section 234D, effective from June 1, 2003, cannot be applied to assessment years prior to its introduction. However, if the regular assessment is completed after this date, the provision applies.

                          Issue 2: Levy of Interest under Section 234D for Periods Subsequent to its Introduction

                          Facts and Arguments:
                          - The assessee received a refund, but subsequent checks revealed it was not entitled to it, leading to the levy of interest under Section 234D.
                          - The Tribunal held that interest could not be charged for assessment years before June 1, 2003, even if the regular assessment was completed after this date.

                          Legal Precedents and Judgment:
                          - The court examined the principles laid down in cases like J. K. Synthetics Ltd. v. CTO, which differentiate between charging sections and machinery provisions, and emphasized that provisions for levying interest are substantive laws.
                          - The court noted that the regular assessment in this case was completed on March 30, 2004, well after Section 234D came into force.
                          - The court held that the date of regular assessment, not the assessment year, determines the applicability of Section 234D. Since the regular assessment was completed after June 1, 2003, the assessee is liable to pay interest on the excess refund.

                          Conclusion:
                          - The court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that Section 234D applies to refunds determined after June 1, 2003, irrespective of the assessment year.
                          - Interest on excess refunds is applicable from the date of the regular assessment if it is completed after the introduction of Section 234D.
                          - The orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal were set aside, and the assessee was held liable to pay interest on the excess refund.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found