TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds duty exemption for supplying goods to research institutions</h1> <h3>CCE Mumbai III Versus M/s. RK. Control Instruments Pvt. Ltd.</h3> CCE Mumbai III Versus M/s. RK. Control Instruments Pvt. Ltd. - 2012 (279) E.L.T. 451 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues:Whether the respondents are entitled to claim the benefit under Notification No. 10/97 dated 01.03.1997 for Scientific and Technical instrument, apparatus, equipment, and accessories/spare parts supplied to specific research institutions.Analysis:The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order-in-appeal dated 25.09.2003. The case involved M/s. R.K. Control Instruments Pvt. Ltd., manufacturers of Control Valve and accessories under Chapter No. 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondents filed classification declarations and certificates from relevant authorities stating the goods were for research purposes only. Show-cause notices were issued, but dropped by the Asst. Commissioner based on the certificates. The Revenue appealed to the Commissioner (Appeals), who upheld the order-in-original. The Revenue then appealed to the Tribunal.The Revenue argued that the goods used for regulating the flow of gases/liquids did not qualify as Scientific and Technical instruments, apparatus, or equipment under Notification No. 10/97. The respondents' advocate countered that the duty exemption was available with the required certificates from authorities, which were submitted in this case. The certificates clarified the goods were for research purposes only, making the respondents eligible for the exemption.After considering both sides, the Tribunal found that the issue revolved around the entitlement of the respondents under Notification No. 10/97 for supplying goods to specific research institutions. The certificates provided by the appropriate authorities clearly stated the goods were for research purposes only. The Tribunal held that the respondents were eligible for the exemption based on these certificates, upholding the order-in-appeal and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the importance of the certificates issued by relevant authorities to establish the eligibility for duty exemption under Notification No. 10/97 for goods supplied to specific research institutions.
TaxTMI 