Service tax adjudication remanded after audit report was not considered before confirming demand and penalty.

The service tax dispute turned on whether an audit report produced by the appellant had to be considered before confirming demand and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant relied on a Chartered Accountant's certificate and the later audit report to contend that service tax had been paid on subsequent receipts and that no demand survived. Because the audit report was not before the original adjudicating authority, it required examination at the adjudication stage. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Jurisdictional Commissioner for fresh adjudication after considering the audit report and granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned service tax order required to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision in view of the audit report produced by the appellant.

Analysis: The appeal arose from a waiver application concerning substantial service tax demand and penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant relied on a Chartered Accountant's certificate and a later audit report to contend that service tax had been paid on subsequent receipts and that no demand survived. As the audit report was not before the Commissioner when the original order was passed, the report required consideration at the adjudication stage. A fresh decision with a reasonable opportunity of hearing was therefore necessary.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Jurisdictional Commissioner for fresh adjudication after considering the audit report and granting an opportunity of hearing to the appellant.

---