TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the imported old and used digital multifunction printing and copying machines and wide format printing machines could be treated as e-waste or hazardous waste so as to justify withholding release. (ii) Whether, in the absence of a show cause notice and on the facts found, the goods were liable to provisional release on conditions.
Issue (i): Whether the imported old and used digital multifunction printing and copying machines and wide format printing machines could be treated as e-waste or hazardous waste so as to justify withholding release.
Analysis: The goods were examined in the presence of Customs officers and were certified by the empanelled Chartered Engineer as operational and functional. The certificate recorded that the machines, by outward appearance and material composition, could not be considered e-waste or hazardous waste. The respondents did not undertake any contrary inspection through competent environmental authorities despite the passage of time. In these circumstances, the mere assertion that the consignment fell within the hazardous waste rules was not accepted.
Conclusion: The goods were not established to be e-waste or hazardous waste on the material placed before the Court.
Issue (ii): Whether, in the absence of a show cause notice and on the facts found, the goods were liable to provisional release on conditions.
Analysis: The Court relied on the scheme of Sections 17 and 18 of the Customs Act, 1962, under which imported goods are to be examined, assessed and cleared without undue delay and, where needed, provisionally assessed. Since the requisite documents had been furnished and no show cause notice had been issued, the goods could not be treated as restricted merely by administrative withholding. Following the course adopted in similar matters, provisional release on monetary conditions was found appropriate, while preserving the department's right to proceed in adjudication.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to release of the goods on deposit of 25% of the enhanced value together with duty on the enhanced value, with liberty to the Customs authorities to continue adjudication.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were allowed in substance by directing provisional release of the imported machines on specified conditions, while leaving adjudication open to the Customs authorities.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported used machinery is shown by a contemporaneous inspection to be functional and not e-waste, and no show cause notice or contrary technical assessment is produced, Customs may not withhold release indefinitely and provisional release on conditions is permissible under the Customs assessment framework.
TaxTMI 
