Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Explanation inserted to Section 65(19)(ii) of the Finance Act, 1994, which brings services in relation to promotion or marketing of lotteries within the levy of service tax, is unconstitutional and inapplicable to lottery distributors.
Analysis: The Explanation was enacted to extend the scope of business auxiliary service to services connected with promotion or marketing of games of chance, including lotteries. The Court held that the earlier Supreme Court ruling concerning lottery tickets as actionable claims did not negate the validity of the later amendment, and that the amendment operated prospectively. It further held that lottery tickets are outside the scope of goods for this purpose, so the petitioners could not invoke the provision dealing with promotion or marketing of goods. The Court found that the discount or commission earned by distributors and retailers constituted consideration for service rendered to the lottery organisers, and that the marketing and distribution chain necessarily involved taxable service in relation to lottery.
Conclusion: The constitutional challenge failed, and the service rendered by the petitioners in relation to lottery was held taxable under Section 65(105)(zzb) read with the Explanation to Section 65(19)(ii) of the Finance Act, 1994.