Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for computing deduction under section 80-IA(8), the electricity generated by the assessee's windmills and transferred for captive consumption in its yarn manufacturing business had to be valued at the rate at which it was sold to the Electricity Board or at the rate at which the assessee purchased electricity from the Board for industrial use.
Analysis: Section 80-IA(8) requires the consideration recorded for transfer of goods or services between the eligible business and the other business to correspond to market value. The electricity generated by the windmills was not supplied in a competitive market but under a regulated tariff structure under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The rate at which the assessee sold power to the Board did not represent market value for the purposes of section 80-IA(8), because the sale to the Board was compelled by the regulatory framework and not the result of open market conditions. By contrast, the rate at which the Board supplied electricity to the assessee's industrial unit reflected the price payable by an industrial consumer and was treated as the proper market value for the captive transfer.
Conclusion: The electricity transferred to the assessee's yarn manufacturing business had to be valued at Rs. 3.50 per unit, being the rate payable by the assessee to the Electricity Board, and not at Rs. 2.70 per unit; the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80-IA was therefore to be computed on that basis.