Appeals partly allowed, fresh adjudication on specific issues, challenges dismissed, losses on investments reconsidered.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing fresh adjudication on specific issues while upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on others. The Revenue's challenges regarding depreciation on Stock Exchange Membership Card, disallowance of penalty/fine, addition of bad debts, and credit for TDS on dividend income were dismissed. The matter of setting off losses on investments against gains in shares was sent back to the A.O. for reconsideration. The addition of advances not recoverable written off was upheld, and the issue of software expenses was remanded for fresh adjudication.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Depreciation on BSE/NSE Stock Exchange Membership Card
2. Disallowance of penalty/fine paid to BSE/NSE
3. Addition of bad debts
4. Credit for TDS on dividend income
5. Set off loss on sale of investments against gain in shares
6. Addition of advances not recoverable written off
7. Addition of software expenses

Detailed Analysis:

1. Depreciation on BSE/NSE Stock Exchange Membership Card
The Revenue challenged the deletion of the addition of Rs. 3,16,582/- for depreciation on BSE/NSE Stock Exchange Membership Card. The Tribunal found that the issue is covered in favor of the assessee by the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in Techno Shares and Stocks Ltd., which held that depreciation is allowable on the cost of the Membership Card under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the Revenue's ground was dismissed.

2. Disallowance of Penalty/Fine Paid to BSE/NSE
The Revenue contested the deletion of Rs. 17,217/- disallowed by the A.O. for penalty/fine paid to BSE/NSE. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, stating that the payments were compensatory and not for any infringement of law. The Tribunal upheld this view, referencing a similar decision in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2002-03, and dismissed the Revenue's ground.

3. Addition of Bad Debts
The Revenue disputed the deletion of Rs. 6,59,780/- added by the A.O. as bad debts. The CIT(A) relied on a Tribunal decision in DCIT vs. V. Vrijlal Lallubhai & Sons to delete the addition. The Tribunal found the issue covered in favor of the assessee by the Special Bench decision in Shreyas S. Morakhia, which held that amounts receivable by a share broker from clients are trading debts and eligible for deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) after being written off as irrecoverable. The Revenue's ground was dismissed.

4. Credit for TDS on Dividend Income
The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s direction to allow TDS credit of Rs. 1,15,585/- when only Rs. 79,150/- of the corresponding dividend income was assessed in the assessee's hands. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, noting that the assessee had refunded the remaining dividend to clients and thus correctly claimed the TDS credit. The Revenue's ground was dismissed.

5. Set Off Loss on Sale of Investments Against Gain in Shares
The assessee contested the CIT(A)'s confirmation of the A.O.'s action in not setting off a loss on the sale of investments of Rs. 41,35,004/- against a gain in shares of Rs. 37,30,171/-. The CIT(A) upheld the A.O.'s view that such losses are governed by specific provisions for capital assets and cannot be set off against business income. The Tribunal, however, found that the matter required fresh adjudication by the A.O., considering the principle of consistency and whether the Revenue had accepted similar treatment in previous years. The issue was restored to the A.O. for fresh adjudication.

6. Addition of Advances Not Recoverable Written Off
The assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 7,96,255/- as bad debts. The A.O. and CIT(A) disallowed the claim, noting non-compliance with Section 37(1)(vii) r.w.s. 36(2) and that the loss did not pertain to the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed the assessee's ground.

7. Addition of Software Expenses
Both parties agreed that the issue of Rs. 43,642/- on account of software expenses required fresh adjudication. The Tribunal restored the issue to the A.O. for fresh adjudication in light of the Special Bench decision in Amway (India) Ltd., directing the A.O. to decide in accordance with law after giving due opportunity to the assessee.

Conclusion:
Both the appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed fresh adjudication on specific issues while upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on others. The order was pronounced on 15.06.2011.

---