Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received for data processing support by use of disc space and embedded software in the assessee's hardware was taxable as royalty under the India-Singapore DTAA and section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee's receipt was examined in the light of the treaty definition of royalty, which covers consideration for the use or right to use industrial, commercial or scientific equipment. The decisive test applied was whether the customer had positive use of, access to, control over, or the right to operate the equipment, as distinct from merely taking advantage of a facility provided by the other party. On the facts, the customer had no physical access to the computer hardware and no control over it; it could only transmit raw data for processing. The facts being identical to the assessee's earlier year, the earlier view that such payment did not constitute royalty was followed.
Conclusion: The receipt was not taxable as royalty.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment is not royalty for use of equipment unless the payer has positive use, access, or control over the equipment; mere use of a service facility or processing system does not amount to use or right to use equipment.