Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of M/s.Nakshtra: Refund allowed for service tax on construction activities The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that the services provided by M/s.Nakshtra, Pune constituted a 'works contract' and not 'construction of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of M/s.Nakshtra: Refund allowed for service tax on construction activities
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that the services provided by M/s.Nakshtra, Pune constituted a "works contract" and not "construction of commercial complexes." The refund claim of Rs.3,15,254 for service tax on construction activities was allowed, as the rate of tax was deemed to fall under Section 35D (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled on a case involving a refund claim of Rs.3,15,254 paid by M/s.Nakshtra, Pune for service tax on construction activities. The issue was whether the service fell under "construction of commercial complexes" or "works contract." The matter was referred to a Division Bench as the rate of tax was in question under Section 35D (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.