Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the State of Bihar was a "seller" of alcoholic liquor for human consumption within the meaning of section 44AC and section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The statutory scheme of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915 and the rules framed thereunder showed that the State exercised pervasive control over manufacture, storage, supply, issue and price of country liquor, while the retail vendors obtained supplies only through the State-controlled warehouse system. Sections 44AC and 206C were enacted as anti-evasion measures, and their language had to be read in light of their object and the mischief they were intended to cure. A literal construction that excluded the State from the expression "seller" would defeat the legislative purpose, because the State conducted the sale arrangements, realised the cost price along with duty, and stood in the position of the entity through which the transfer to retail dealers was effected.
Conclusion: The State of Bihar was held to be a "seller" for the purposes of section 44AC and section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the challenge to the demand failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of sections 44AC and 206C, the expression "seller" must be construed purposively with reference to the statutory scheme and legislative object, and a State which conducts and controls the sale of liquor through a regulated excise system can fall within that expression even if title does not pass in a conventional commercial sense.