TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal cancels penalty under Income Tax Act due to assessee's good faith and lack of willful concealment</h1> <h3>Income Tax Officer, Versus Shri Pushpendra Surana,</h3> Income Tax Officer, Versus Shri Pushpendra Surana, - TMI Issues:Levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Levy of PenaltyThe Department objected to the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) by the CIT(A). The AO initiated penalty proceedings based on the assessee's alleged concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars. The AO imposed a penalty of Rs.15,41,732 on the tax amount of Rs.70,07,877, claiming that the assessee concealed income by not declaring long term capital gains (LTCG) and claiming false expenses in the return. The CIT(A) considered the submissions of the assessee, who argued that the initial return was filed based on a certificate from the Tehsildar stating the land was outside municipal limits, and the revised return included LTCG after receiving a notice u/s 148. The CIT(A) found that the assessee acted in good faith and there was no willful concealment. The AO accepted the revised return and the LTCG declared therein, making it unjust to impose a penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars as the AO had accepted the income details provided by the assessee. The CIT(A) held that the penalty was not justified, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.Judgment:After considering the orders of the AO and the CIT(A), the Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal found that the assessee acted in good faith based on the Tehsildar's certificate and there was no malafide intention in not paying capital gains tax. The Tribunal noted that the AO had accepted the income details in the revised return, and therefore, penalizing the assessee for furnishing inaccurate particulars was unwarranted. The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Department's appeal.This detailed analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the judgment, focusing on the issues involved and the reasoning behind the decisions made by the authorities and the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 